problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Topic: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49) (Read 35754 times) previous topic - next topic

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #35 – August 29, 2008, 06:21:15 pm

That's what I told you here already.

You'll need a more recent nightly. The r1973 Frank posted at the bottom of that thread should work.

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #36 – August 29, 2008, 06:29:06 pm

oops sorry I have forgoten it

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #37 – August 30, 2008, 08:11:27 pm

I have an other problem

The parameter "max_lenght" of my bridges don't work

(off-topic : where I can download Tile-cutter ?)

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #38 – August 30, 2008, 08:57:18 pm

Do you have a .dat file?

and tilecutter should be linked here

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #39 – August 30, 2008, 09:47:48 pm

Then spell it max_length ...

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #40 – August 30, 2008, 09:58:44 pm

Errr... no. "length" is correct English - however, in the .dat files it has been "lenght" for a long time (even the sources of pak64 and the wiki show it that way).

EDIT:
But maybe you did it the other way round and used "max_length" instead of max_lenght" ?

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #41 – August 31, 2008, 08:09:15 am

th, ht…

Lenght, Width. Well known to all programmers. It's present even in Borland's VCL (maybe no more). Nobody cares for spelling $:-\$

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #42 – August 31, 2008, 12:33:59 pm

I already checked it. I wrote "max_lenght".

for example I post AMT dat file.

BUT I just used the function "Spell Check" and it's not "max_lenght" but "max_length". "max_lenght" is written on the German wiki !

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #43 – August 31, 2008, 12:42:15 pm

Quote from: gauthier – on August 31, 2008, 12:33:59 pm

...
"max_lenght" is written on the German wiki !

max_lenght is the current name from parameter

in the current makeobj was probably changed to max_length

max_lenght is apparently no longer supported

or is a bug in makeobj/simutrans

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #44 – August 31, 2008, 06:40:31 pm

Is supported in the next again, since this was reported earlier.

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #45 – September 23, 2008, 07:44:40 pm

constraint don't work

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #46 – September 23, 2008, 07:46:42 pm

Was is your Errormessage?

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #47 – September 23, 2008, 07:55:41 pm

"None" must be the last entry, not the first!

EDIT:
"SNFOS_None" appears to be a typo for "none", while "SNFOS_Aero_avant" and "SNFOS_Aero_bar" are not defined at all in this file.

So try these for front:

Code: [Select]

Constraint[Prev][0]=SNFOS_Aero_rear
Constraint[Prev][1]=None
Constraint[Next][0]=SNFOS_Aero_car
Constraint[Next][1]=SNFOS_Aero_mails

and these for rear:

Code: [Select]

Constraint[Prev][0]=SNFOS_Aero_car
Constraint[Prev][1]=SNFOS_Aero_mails
Constraint[Next][0]=SNFOS_Aero_front
Constraint[Next][1]=None

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #48 – September 23, 2008, 09:20:49 pm

none not None

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #49 – September 23, 2008, 09:54:34 pm

I don't remember that being case-sensitive...

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #50 – September 24, 2008, 11:44:37 am

I put "none" in last position and replaced "SNFOS_none" by "none" but it doesn't work again. It is strange.

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #51 – September 24, 2008, 11:51:44 am

Can you show me the new dat?

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #52 – September 24, 2008, 06:32:46 pm

of course

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #53 – September 24, 2008, 06:47:42 pm

And can you show us the pngs?

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #54 – September 24, 2008, 06:54:35 pm

2 quick things:

1.) you use "SNFOS_Aero_bar" in your constraints several times - but this vehicle is not defined in the dat.

2.) in the "rear" vehicle you have "SNFOS_Aero_avant" in the constraints - the vehicle is called "SNFOS_Aero_front"

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #55 – September 24, 2008, 07:07:43 pm

sorry it's the evening, I'm a bit tired -_-'

Thanks a lot, it works !

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #56 – December 21, 2008, 12:47:22 am

else starts me only a window jumps up and nothing

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #57 – December 21, 2008, 01:29:32 am

makeobj is a command line tool and has no GUI - so double clicking doesn't work.

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #58 – December 26, 2008, 07:09:33 pm

Currently I use two command files.

create.bat : create pak files from all dat files in the folder
merge.bat : merge all pak files in one pak file.

note : change the name of the pak file in merge.bat by opening it with a simple text editor ("bloc note" in the French version of windows).

create.bat : copy this in the text editor and save it with .bat extension

Quote

makeobj pak128 2>err.txt

=> errors will be written in err.txt

merge.bat copy this in the text editor, change the name of your final pak file as you want, save it with .bat extension

Quote

makeobj MERGE name.pak *.pak

these files MUST be in the same folder of makeobj.exe

Re: problem with latest makeobj (makeobj 49)

Reply #59 – December 27, 2008, 02:23:51 am

I'm using this.

Quote

makeobj pak128 > err.txt 2>&1
err.txt

In stderr, you can see olny png file related error.
Problems like syntax error are logged in stdout.

So, I always check both of them.