Shipyards September 22, 2009, 10:05:41 am It would appear that the Ship Depots are missing or not showing in r2650. Quote Selected Last Edit: September 22, 2009, 10:12:40 am by Colin
Re: Shipyards Reply #1 – September 22, 2009, 10:57:28 am hm. It does work for me (an old pak64 installation with trunk rev 2659). Quote Selected
Re: Shipyards Reply #2 – September 22, 2009, 01:46:56 pm Quote from: Dwachs – on September 22, 2009, 10:57:28 amhm. It does work for me (an old pak64 installation with trunk rev 2659).I copied the ship depots from an older PAK and they work fine, tried again with r2650, no luck. But hey! if r2659 is out and works, who cares about r2650?LOL Quote Selected
Re: Shipyards Reply #3 – September 22, 2009, 04:31:58 pm Could you specify what exactly did not work? no menu icon, buildings disappear etc? Could you upload the offending pak's? Quote Selected
Re: Shipyards Reply #4 – September 23, 2009, 06:20:12 am Quote from: Dwachs – on September 22, 2009, 04:31:58 pmCould you specify what exactly did not work? no menu icon, buildings disappear etc? Could you upload the offending pak's?When you open the Ships Icon there are no Depots neither the left or right hand one. Can't upload them I've over written them from a previous version. But it was r2650 Edit:Sorry, I think I missled you with this It was not the Nightly Revision it was the new PAK 182. Quote Selected Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 08:21:06 am by Colin
Re: Shipyards Reply #5 – September 23, 2009, 10:42:08 am Quote from: Colin – on September 23, 2009, 06:20:12 amSorry, I think I missled you with this It was not the Nightly Revision it was the new PAK 182.Ah ok But then your bug report should go into the pak 281 board Quote Selected
Re: Shipyards Reply #6 – September 23, 2009, 11:39:51 am I think he's talking about pak64 r182 - he didn't misspell "pak128", so he's quite right here, wouldn't you agree? Quote Selected
Re: Shipyards Reply #8 – September 23, 2009, 06:31:10 pm Quote from: DirrrtyDirk – on September 23, 2009, 11:39:51 amI think he's talking about pak64 r182 - he didn't misspell "pak128", so he's quite right here, wouldn't you agree? Thank you Dirk, you are quite right I did mean PAK 64 r182. I sometimes forget in my doteage that I should write and speak in words of not more than two syllables. Quote Selected Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 06:37:37 pm by Colin